১ কোটি ডলার জরিমানা দিলো ফেইসবুক

৫ ইউজারের করা মামলায় ১ কোটি ডলার জরিমানা দিলো সোশাল নেটওয়ার্কিং সাইট ফেইসবুক। সোশাল অ্যাডের মাধ্যমে সদস্যদের অ্যাকাউন্ট এবং ব্যক্তিগত তথ্য রক্ষার অধিকার খণ্ডন করায় মামলাটি করেছিলেন ফেইসবুকের ওই ৫ ইউজার। মামলায় হেরে এখন ১ কোটি ডলার জরিমানা দিতে হচ্ছে সোশাল নেটওয়ার্কিং সাইটটিকে। জনকল্যাণমূলক কাজে ব্যবহার করা হবে এই ১ কোটি ডলারের পুরোটাই। খবর বিবিসির।

ফেইসবুকে ওই সোশাল অ্যাডগুলো ‘স্পনসর্ড স্টোরি’ হিসেবে পরিচিত। আর বিজ্ঞাপনগুলোতে ‘লাইক’ করলেই ব্যবহারকারীর ফেইসবুক বন্ধুদের পেইজে পপআপ হিসেবে দেখা যেতো।

গত বছরের ডিসেম্বর মাসে ক্যালিফোর্নিয়ার স্যান হোজের ফেডারেল কোর্টে ওয়েবসাইটটিতে সোশাল অ্যাডের যথেচ্ছ ব্যবহারের বিরুদ্ধে মামলা করেন ফেইসবুকেরই ৫ ব্যবহারকারী। সম্প্রতি মামলাটির রায়ে ওই ৫ সদস্যের দাবির পক্ষে রায় দিয়ে ফেইসবুককে ১ কোটি ডলার জরিমানা করে বসে আদালত।

মামলার শুনানিতে এই ধরনের বিজ্ঞাপনকে ফেইসবুক প্রতিষ্ঠাতা মার্ক জুকারবার্গ ‘হোলি গ্রেইল অফ অ্যাডভার্টাইজিং’ বলে দাবি করলেও তার এই দাবি আমলে নেয়নি আদালত। মামলার রায়ে জজ লুসি কোহ বলেন, ‘কারো ব্যক্তিগত পছন্দ বা অপছন্দ নিয়ে কোনো তথ্য তার অনুমতি ছাড়া ব্যবহার করা ক্যালিফোর্নিয়ার আইন বিরোধী।’

তবে এ মামলাটির নিষ্পত্তি হলেও আরো বেশ কয়েকটি মামলায় আদালতে লড়ছে ফেইসবুক। শেয়ার মার্কেটে অভিষেকের কিছুদিন পরই জুকারবার্গ এবং ফেইসবুক তাদের সর্বশেষ অর্থনৈতিক তথ্য গোপন করছে এই দাবিতে মামলা করেন শেয়ারহোল্ডাররা। অন্যদিকে ফেইসবুক অনুমতি ছাড়াই ১০টি পেটেন্টের অপব্যবহার করেছে এই অভিযোগে মামলা করেছে আরেক ইন্টারনেট জায়ান্ট ইয়াহু।

Microsoft Apologized for Bad Lyrics

Software giant Microsoft had to say sorry to Norwegian developers who were apparently shocked at the company’s presentation which included dancing girls and obscene song lyrics.

A video of the routine, which was presented at the Norwegian Developers Conference in the country’s capital in order to promote new advances in Azure cloud computing platform, went viral. Apparently, Microsoft decided that before the conference participants get into technical details about the computing system it would be a great idea to warm the crowd up with a couple of dancers and house music.

However, the song’s lyrics that appeared on the screen were so bad that Coldplay could look Shakespearean by comparison. No-one will ever forget the epic line: “The words MICRO and SOFT don't apply to my penis”!

The press reports show that the developers weren’t amused, and hurried to turn to Twitter. One of the programmers wrote “For those not here, we had flashing disco lights, bad lyrics about penis, disco beats and dancing azure girls, so cringeworthy”. Another one tweeted: “This music thing is probably the most embarrassing I’ve ever seen and heard”. Apparently, both of them have never seen an Apple Store team chant…

Meanwhile, the YouTube posting of the Norwegian Developer’s Conference had a Volish statement underneath claiming that the event included a skit with inappropriate and offensive elements and vulgar language. Now the software giant’s top spinners are busy looking into the whole issue of semi-naked dancing girls and foul language. Perhaps, the entire incident just reminded them of one of their sales briefings. In the meantime, the experts are looking forward to the next Microsoft presentation, trying to guess what they will see there.

Skype is Ruined by Advertisements

It seems that the popular P2P calls are no longer free, with the services offered by Skype being plagued by huge display adverts. The company is now bringing in the feature known as “Conversation Ads”, which will pop up within the calling window when you are talking to someone. Perhaps, the Skype marketing department believes that the users will see the ads and start talking about their content to the caller.

Actually, it’s something that advertising people always believe in – that their product is so good that the consumers will want to talk about it. However, in reality the callers will be swearing at the ad.

Skype admitted that the advertisements will be targeted at the consumers based on their location, gender and age. The representatives of the company explained that on a 1:1 audio call, the callers will see material that could spark additional topics of conversation, relevant to the users, as well as “highlight unique and local brand experiences”.

Apparently, people have nothing better to do in a consumption-based capitalism other than discussing the goods randomly flashed on their screens. Meanwhile, Skype marketing department believes that the advertising is a great way for the company to create interactivity between the users’ circle of friends and family and the brands they care about.

The experts suspect that the advertisements won’t be small as well, promising the display ads to be just as big as the picture of someone you are trying to talk to. Another hint the observers have made is that the adverts will pop up during Skype-to-Skype audio calls for Windows users. Nevertheless, only those will be affected who don’t have Skype Credit or subscriptions.

The company claims that there won’t be any degradation of the call quality and that the advertisements will be silent and non-expanding. In addition, the most discontent Skype users will be allowed to opt out of personalized advertisements, though it is a bit tricky to do. If you are one of them, then go to the Privacy menu in Tools and choose Options of Skype for Windows OS. Although you will still get advertisements, those will relate only to your location rather than hit your personal information.

Added: Tuesday, June 19th, 2012 Category: Recent Headlines Involving File Sharing > Ridiculous Criminal Trials Tags:ET, p2p, Torrent, Piracy, Peer To Peer, Network, Hackers, Internet,BitTorrent, Google, utorrent, bitcomet, extratorrent, 2010,www.extrattorrent.com

An American federal grand jury in Los Angeles believes that British justice won’t be enough for a 20-year-old hacker. A Grand jury has indicted Ryan Cleary on charges connected with the numerous attacks by the LulzSec hacktivists, whose victims were the Fox and PBS television networks, as well as Sony’s movie and TV studio.

Now the guy is awaiting prosecution over similar charges in his motherland, the UK. However, the America is worried that he won’t have to suffer from one of its backward trillion year prison sentences, while in the United States he could be locked up for 25 years.

The Grand Jury is the first step to get Cleary to the United States where he would face the music for crimes he’s done over the pond. Ryan is accused of using botnets in order to steal confidential data, deface websites, and attack servers.

The Feds told the press that the UK man is an experienced hacker, who was controlling his own botnet, using various sophisticated methods. Meanwhile, Ryan’s broad geographic scope affected a lot of organizations and individuals.

The charges of the United States are based on the evidence of a super-grass Hector Xavier Monsegur. The latter pleaded guilty to hacking-related charges and disclosed the FBI information on his fellow hackers. The FBI has released an indictment saying that Ryan Cleary and his unnamed accomplices have hacked into the web systems of News Corp (this one is really ironic), as well as of Sony Pictures Entertainment, where they stole confidential user data. Aside from this, Cleary is also charged with defacing the PBS site and starting DDoS attacks against one of the online gaming sites and UK’s Serious Organized Crime Agency.

However, nobody can explain why exactly Ryan should be charged in an American court with hacking a UK website. The matter is that Cleary is already charged with that in the United Kingdom, so being punished twice for the same offence would be very unfair.

As for the FBI, they magnanimously admitted that the authorities of the United States would “allow the prosecution to take its course” against the hacker overseas prior to deciding whether to seek his extradition to the US. The experts guess that anything less than a British hanging is the request of the US for Cleary to be extradited. 

UK Privacy Outfits Opposed Communications Bill

UK government’s justification of the Communications Bill seems to have angered privacy groups. They claim that the plans will tarnish everyone with the same “guilty” brush.

Theresa May is expected today to push ahead with a draft of the legislation, which suggests to allow police access to people’s social networking and online activity, including emails, gaming and P2P phone calls. When outlining plans to store this data for a year, the Home Secretary claimed that it was necessary to help keep up and target criminals like terrorists and sex offenders.

Nevertheless, privacy groups explained that the legislation in question could violate human rights and tarnish everyone in the United Kingdom with the same “guilty” brush. The Open Rights Group believes that more consideration is necessary to make sure that the law is in line with human rights. As a result, the law could be challenged in a human rights court and pushed back in order to protect the public.

The matter is that the authorities will be able to reveal the identities of whistleblowers, celebrities and journalists. Since it will all be through police will, the industry could be moving into very dangerous territory.

Meanwhile, the privacy campaign outfit Big Brother Watch shared the same concerns, saying that in our free society innocent people shouldn’t justify why the authorities can’t spy on them. In fact, the proposed legislation goes against the Coalition Agreement and Conservative pre-election policy. Moreover, it is called basically illiberal, intrusive and unable to improve national security.

Privacy International points out that in the United Kingdom, the industries have historically operated under the presumption that the authorities had no business peering into the lives of people unless there was good reason to do so. Now, the Communications Bill would reverse that presumption and change the relationship between people and authorities.

Thus far, police and security services are able to access details of online visits and other communications information only if it’s stored by phone or web companies. But the suggested legislation will provide automatic access to the police and many other agencies, including NHS trusts and the Environment Agency. All of them will be able to make a case before Parliament if they want to access this data.